I think there is some negative bias toward this club because, frankly, pulling out a square driver is sort of like singing in the library. Write your review You must enter a review of between and characters. Compared to the FT-3, the FT-5 is an obvious, evolutionary next step. Would have been a great day except for the rest of my game was poo. This club is very good and I was hitting straight and long, recommended.
|Date Added:||10 December 2013|
|File Size:||62.37 Mb|
|Operating Systems:||Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
So I tee it a little lower and back a little in my stace and problem fixed. By the way i got my driver off of ebay for only canadian! We can notify you by email the moment it’s in stock! At first the shape was a little difficult to take, but after several pokes with this big boy it is easy to get used to.
Try up the middle. On the occasion when I forced a slower swing speed the ball went yards further.
Callaway FT-5 Tour Neutral Driver
If I was in the market for a new driver and had resisted earlier Fusion drivers, the FT-5 would be the one to make me change my mind. Hit it square and it goes, and with off center hits, less mileage lost as compared to the FT-i.
I went with the FT-i, because I just kept hitting it in the middle of the fairway so often. The Big Bertha name is gone from the FT-5 and FT-i more on that bit of identity crisis laterxallaway the design basics remain.
I hit the second on the heel and the ball leaked a bit to the right. If you put a big outside-in swing on it, the FT-i is still capable of peeling a nice banana for you.
The FT-5 comes standard with a inch, gram Fujikura Callawsy shaft that has mid torque and a mid kickpoint, available in light, regular and stiff flexes. Right Handed Left Handed Ladies. Others in my group were often longer, but I was deadly accurate. I agree with the review above with a few exceptions.
Callaway FT-5 Tour Neutral Driver – Callaway Drivers – Golfbidder
The squat, square shape of the clubface reminds me a bit of the old Power Pod driver, if one had been ca,laway a bit. Share this with your golf buddies: The distance I achieved was yards longer than with my usual driver years old Wilson with Too stiff a shaft on your old club, and your ball may have started right, and moved more right due to a misfitted shaft. How about a review on the Taylormade Superquad? It would also be a lot easier on my pocket. I tried it a second time with a shaft better suited to me, and I absolutely loved it after playing one round with it.
I love the feel and the looks of it. Thus, less side spin…or slice. Went to a 10 deg neutral and wow, is this thing forgiving and long. Although maybe suited more to the better player simply for lack of forgiveness compared to other drivers on the market, this is a fantastic piece of technology and i would recommend anyone to demo one out. These initial impressions were more than borne out on the course.
Callaway FT 5 Drivers user reviews : out of 5 – 73 reviews –
Though it is the same size cc as the FT-3, the FT-5 looks bigger at address but less bulbous from the front and back. I just picked one up and I gained 25 yards carry. I have not seen the distance neural as some people have seen. Sound is better than the FT3, but to be honest, it wasn’t worth the extra money upgrading, not for me anyway – the FT3 is still the one. At nrutral level when browsing all the sets of a particular model the RRP displayed is for an 8 iron set – usually 3-PW or 4-SW – with steel shafts.
I recently received an FT-i driver as a gift.
First impressions on the range were very positive – more consistent trajectory, good distance, and on impact, greater feel and a more satisfying noise than the FT Bought my FT-5 last season, and continue to like it. I love this stick!